Published: 03/05/17 (12:20 am)

Local professional boxer Oliver Pinnock was arrested yesterday by four police officers, over a dispute with his local council concerning council tax. Oliver was withholding his payments not refusing to pay until the council answered his questions. The council have never correctly replied to his questions, all they seem to be interested in is getting Olliver arrested at the tax payers expense. 

“I don’t think we were expecting any different today. It was very alarming to find he would be tried in a virtual court.”

Pete’s wife Vickey also added:

“When Pete asked the police officer if she had taken her oath of office she declined to answer (clearly she has and doesn’t want to say yes as that’s as good as admitting she’s taking part in something that is illegal) she said ‘we’ve had so many people calling up asking that today. So at least people are making that effort! Well done.”

Custody officer Sgt Bailey and other police officers at Southend police station are refusing to give any information about the case, and Sgt Bailey said the case would be heard in a “VIRTUAL COURT” from the police station. The public need to know what’s going on with police and council working together to deny people their human (especially constitutional) rights. 

Non-payment of council tax is a Civil matter so why has it been treated as a criminal one? Concealment of the bigger crime? Let us explain:

Because Article 61 is undeniably in affect right now, this constitutes to High Treason.

For one to fully understand, the Crown has been deposed from power since this law (Article 61) came into affect. This means that there actually isn’t a legitimate government in place (or judiciary) unless they too are standing under it. It requires everyone on the land to swear an oath to the barons (Lords) committee whom invoked these ancient rights in 2001. (Reported on by the Telegraph)

As the sixty first clause clearly recognises:

“And let anyone in the land who wishes take an oath to obey the orders of the said twenty-five barons for the execution of all the aforesaid matters, and with them to distress us as much as he can, and we publicly and freely give anyone leave to take the oath who wishes to take it and we will never prohibit anyone from taking it.

It also goes on to say:

“Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling of themselves and of their own accord to take an oath to the twenty-five barons to help them to distrain and distress us, we will make them take the oath as aforesaid at our command.

So quite simply, its a case of standing under the law, or aiding and abetting treasonous administration of governance.
For those who are interested why this law came into effect, we direct you HERE. We cannot continue to let tyranny reign. 



[UPDATE: OLLIE PINNOCK IS NOW FREE ONCE AGAIN! THANK YOU ALL, ITS ONLY BEEN 3 DAYS SINCE THE UNLAWFUL KIDNAPPING TOOK PLACE! FOR ALL THAT HAVE SHOWN SUPPORT, WE ARE GRATEFUL]

Our ancestors created these constitutional principals and safeguards in uprisings against despotism in the past. Will you let tyrannical (and treasonous) imposters continue this path of destruction and treachery of our nation? (NO!)

JOIN THE CAMPAIGN HERE

[DONATE TO OLLIES FAMILY (by clicking here) IF YOU CAN! HE CAN REALLY USE THE SUPPORT]

‘Southend Standard’ site concealed the crimes from the public.

Southend council have also guided a local paper into making their own version of events entailing outright false reports on the matter which took place. 

Not only is it defamation of character but the council have actually concealed major crimes from the local people of Southend, and the entire country. The public SHOULD FEEL OUTRAGED! They actually stated he WAS sentenced to prison, and that he was released. This is very far from the truth. He was held WITHOUT CHARGE for over 24 hours, and then then he was remanded in custody, for asking a simple question. 

Oliver Pinnock did not refuse to pay, he was simply witholding until the Council could respond with evidence that proves Article 61 and the Nice treaty ratification has been revoked.

As soon as the article was published, many tried to (within reason) assert the truth only to have their comments deleted by the new site.

In this “report” published by South End Standard and states that:
1. “A local man who cited ancient articles from the Magna Carta to avoid paying a council tax debt, has been sentenced to 25 days in jail.”

They made the allegation that it was “to avoid paying council tax”. This is not true as he was simply making a point of law and asking for evidence to suggest otherwise and he was only asking a question, Oliver never actually refused to pay.

2. “Oliver Pinnock, 36, from Priorywood Crescent, Leigh, refused to pay a debt of £875.44, despite several reminders and warnings since November 2015 that his refusal to pay could lead to committal to prison.”

Again, blatant lies. Only after the first sentence, it goes on to give a false statement by claiming that he “refused” to pay. As we have already covered, he did NOT refuse whatsoever.

3. “Pinnock is a local professional welterweight boxer and is linked to a national group called Lawful Rebellion – Practical Lawful Dissent who cite various ancient laws to try and avoid paying council tax.”


“Who site verious ancient laws to try and avoid paying council tax”
. That is not what Practical Lawful Dissent is about at all. The campaign was formulated early in 2013 as a result of the Nice treaty coming into full effect, which attepts to destroy inherent (and fundamental) liberties and privileges. It has become a rally point for dissenters of the EU occupation which fully began on November 1st 2014. 

The main objective is to restore the courts of law, so the treason matter can be heard in a fully convened court de jure. This is the ONLY way we can hold these traitors to account for their treachorous actions not only against constitutional law but the peope of the country, who lawfully rose up in 1689 and WERE victorious when Article 61 was last used.

Practical Lawful Dissent is for those who wish to act with peaceful and lawful dissent against the criminals that govern us. We have no lawful nor moral choice but to reject the regime under the constitutional law.

The news site then claims that;

4. ” In this case, Pinnock and his supporters claim that Article 61 of the Magna Carta, which was written in 1215, means he does not have to pay tax to the local authority without a contract between an individual and the council.”

Firstly, there was NO talk of contracts. Secondly, Article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215 which was clearly invoked on the 23rd of March 2001 (legally deposing the Crown) says that any one on the land may take an oath to “distress us as much as he can” and that the Government shall “publicly and freely give anyone leave to take the oath who wishes to take it and we will never prohibit anyone from taking it”.

It also states: “the community of the whole land shall distrain and distress us in every way they can, namely, by seizing castles, lands, possessions, and in such other ways as they can” until remedy has been achieved.

5. “However, as the council officers made it clear to Pinnock that council tax is a debt payable without the need for a contract or agreement and it is detailed in the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992.”

What we want to make absolutely clear about this matter is that there is no legal government in place (nor any real council officers) to issue/make such demands. As far as the legality of the ‘Council Tax (Administrations and Enforcement) Regulations 1992’ can easily be challenged as not only has all legislation has actually been treasonable since 1911, but there was more than several-thousand breaches since 1972 and crimes are STILL being commited.

6. “Southend Council has since revealed that Mr Pinnock has been released from prison after the council tax debt was paid off.”

Since when was a holding cell a prison?
The commets also included some assisting to the spelling of Olivers Name during the time of creation. A clear indication that someone involved from the local council was coaching this charade of lies? 

You mean the two ‘n’s in Pinnock and the two ‘l’s in Ollie? Besides the obvious fake name (Lee Chapel), this account who seems to be coaching also then replied to a family member of Oliver. Moments later, the family members account was deleted from the site. How strange…

The other comments which seemed to be allowed by the local Newspaper include:

The Daily Express also concealed the crimes from the public… And got it wrong!

Not only did the Daily Express merely copy false information from the first report, but they couldn’t even get simple facts right.

See below: “He pleaded Article 61 of the Bill of Rights signed by King John in 1215”

Wait what? …

Not only was it not “signed” (as it was sealed with the Royal Seal) but since when did the English Bill of Rights have an article 61? And why isn’t it called the Bill of Rights 1215? 

Obvioisly, only the incompetent can be editors for the Daily Express. Either that or they have made a historical recovery being the accidental discovery of a 1215 Bill of Rights. 

To put you completely in the picture with regard to this matter I will explain exactly what Ollie (and many others) have done. Ollie has NEVER refused to pay his council tax he has ONLY asked very relevant questions within a series of legal instruments (Notices) signed, witnessed and sworn upon under penalty of perjury. 

He first conditionally accepted the demand by asking whether or not it woud be illegal for him to pay it. He supplied the evidence that proves it would not be legal to support the council that gains its authority from the crown, since the crown was legally deposed of its title of holder of the office of sovereign after the committee of the barons invoked Article 61. Which they did in accordance with the correct protocols of British Constitutional law. 

Ollies question was ignored. He then served a Notice of Default and Opportunity to cure in an attempt to remedy the matter and, to remain in honour under the law. Again his question was ignored. A further Notice of Default was served to complete the basic process, infoming the council’s named agent, that they were now in default by tacit consent or by lack of substance to prove his claims to be wrong. 

He also served Notice of misprision of treason when they did not stop coercing him to commit crime. In the meantime he served a Notice of lawful objection to his local police chief inspector to seek remedy, merely asking if his standing under the invocation of article 61 was legal, which of course it is and furthermore, is the duty of all british and commonwealth subjects to do. He was again ignored. 

He later recieved a summons, he conditionally accepted the invite to their illegal hearing, demanding that this matter must be heard within a court of common law instead, as it would be illegal for him to attend such a hearing accorcing to Britsh constitutional law. He had no truthful reply and did not attend of course. Approximately 60 members of the group also served Notices of support for Ollie to the so called court, demanding that the law be observed. The crminal regime has attempted to quell the lawful rebellion movement by making an example of Ollie which is why he was arrested, his illegal trial was conducted via video link to keep it out of the public so that the so called court would not be seized by us as it most certainly would have been. 

Habeas Corpus?

He was denied due process which as you know is against Magna Carta and also the Bill of Rights. Ollie then paid under duress to regain his liberty but by doing so, he has not accepted liability, and he is determined to keep within the law and to fight on, we shall now be bringing a counter-claim for the illegal way in which he was processed. 

Evidentially he did not commit any crime whatsoever. Ollie is not a stupid man, has done due dilligence and knows that he has remained completely within the law and been honourable at all times. He always knew that to attempt to pioneeer the process against Council tax, that I have used successfully on a number of occassions against the payment of unlawful taxes was risky, and that it would be a huge battle. He was under no illusion.

However, we all underestimated how blatantly treasonous the regime would react. Ollie is a fighter by trade, he is not easily frightened and he is a very peaceful and honourable man indeed. The regime sought to make an example of him as there was nothing else that they could do. They have attempted to instil fear in the rest of us as they are becoming desperate now…many are now using the same remedy against council tax as the people cannot afford it, and they do not want to aid and abet high treason of course. They know Ollie is a popular member of the movement and is an admin of the group. Since this matter has gone viral it has had the opposite effect than the regime wanted. We are MORE UNITED than ever. More are joining the group daily as they can see clearer how the system really works. This matter is far from over and the support we have is great and getting greater. I will be doing a talk with Tom Crawford next Saturday for example, at the Canal House in Nottingham (13th). Tom seems very interested in what we have been doing, and we have discussed the matter a few times over he phone. The UK Column have supported Ollies plight and will be providing Ollie the chance for him to expose the truth of the matter next week, since the newspapers have lied and misdirected the public (yet again) he is very keen that the truth now be heard.

FACTS:

TRUTH V LIES.

COUNCIL TAX & OLLIE PINNOCK.

TRUTH V LIES.

1. OLLIE DID NOT QUESTION WHERE CT MONIES WERE SPENT.
2. OLLIE DID NOT QUESTION CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.
3. OLLIE WAS NOT ALLOWED A DEFENCE

4. OLLIE WAS TRIED VIA VIDEO LINK IN AN ILLEGAL HEARING

5. OLLIE PAID UNDER EXTREME DURESS

6. OLLIE DID NOT REFUSE TO PAY CT.

7. OLLIE QUESTIONED THE LEGALITY OF PAYING CT ONLY

8. OLLIE DID NOT DO THIS TO SAVE MONEY

9. OLLIE ATTEMPTED TO AVOID AIDING AND ABETTING A TREASONOUS ADMININISTRATION

10. ALL NEWSPAPER REPORTS HAVE LIED TO COVER THE FACTS

    Advertisements