If you’ve taken a look around our site and you now know about the invocation of Article 61 and you’ve seen all the evidence (Viewable content) that’s been provided, you have a lawful obligation under the Rule of LAW to peacefully reject this government. In article 61 it clearly says that if you do submit your oath of allegiance to the Barons Committee, you may lawfully size buildings and assets along with withhold taxes and together As worded in Article Sixty-One itself
“..those twenty-five barons together with the community of the whole land shall distrain and distress us in every way they can, namely, by seizing castles, lands, possessions, and in such other ways as they can, saving our person and the persons of our queen and our children, until, in their opinion, amends have been made; and when amends have been made, they shall obey us as they did before. And let anyone in the land who wishes take an oath to obey the orders of the said twenty-five barons for the execution of all the aforesaid matters, and with them to distress us as much as he can, and we publicly and freely give anyone leave to take the oath who wishes to take it and we will never prohibit anyone from taking it…”
We can strip the corruption from the government. Click on all the links and hyperlinks provided (highlighted in red) for all the info you need.
This is a great thing not only when it’s below freezing outside and certain individuals could be stranded with no money but it can give them a place to stay. This was successfully attempted in 2014 without the idea of helping the homeless when a group of lawfully sworn inhabitants siezed Glastonbury Town Hall.
It was originally planned to be occupied from the 15th untill the 22nd of October but the hall was closed. Those who were occupying the building also thought it would look bad from outside the movement if they had done it for any longer as at the time there was lots of misinformation and negative press about Lawful Rebellion but not now, all the facts are out! And the liars at Parliment are shaking in hysteria. The police were called, they came, they were served notice under Ch.61 and they left without taking any action whatsoever – leaving the group in possession of the building. Why? Because they were acting lawfully!
This was documented and The UK Column also done a report on it. It was for one day they intended to take control, and again the next day and they even informed the police of the intent to take control of the building. Only this time the town hall was closed due to staff training. They informed the police the first day and this is why the police (all 6 of them) had no lawful excuse to remove David Robinson and those who was with him. The next day however the building was closed.
This is the kind of Law asserting revolution that is needed in 2017 before Habeas Corpus -like the Royal Prerogative- is fully dissolved making it harder to combat these corrupt tyrannical theives. If you stand under Article 61, you’ll be doing it for the betterment of your country and can use it to aide and help the community of homeless sleeping rough every night. Imaging letting those who sleep rough sleep in a warm building, lawfully. Although it was just a mere evening it shows indeed where the power lies (the laws of the people). A huge first step in modern times since our ancient law of 1215 was last used during the start of The Glorious Revolution of 1688.
The Magna Carta 1215 is a Peace Treaty between the Crown as an institution and the people. It cannot be repealed by parliment as it was not created by parliment. If you hear it was replaced and then repealed, this is the 1217 version to the 1297 versions which are both acts of parliment. Hence why the 1297 version has came under heavy repeal.
Article 61 states “…those twenty-five barons together with the community of the whole land shall distrain and distress us in every way they can, namely, by seizing castles, lands, possessions”… (see bottom of this story for article 61 in full)
So what can be done with this?
Things are being done, we are building our numbers up whilst unifying under the rule of law. Thousands have sworn oaths already without a problem.
Where can I look for other info?
In terms of occupation of a building, it MUST BE Crown property. If you think that this will allow you to break in to someone’s home you will fail miserably. And will be arrested.
Here’s a thought, how many homeless people do you think could be better off today now that YOU yourself know about the invocation?
Find out more about Lawful Rebellion and the Conditional Acceptence Process with a simple click.
Those who govern are not empowered to breach the Constitution or the law and may never lawfully breach their own sworn oaths of office.
Our right to use Article 61:
“Here is a law which is above the King and Parliament, and which even He and They must not and may not legally break. And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation shall have no force nor effect and can be safely ignored with no legal ill effect. In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those [. . . .] who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favour of any such successful attempts at abrogation. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it.”
[Churchill, A History of the English Speaking Peoples (1956)]
On the subject of Magna Carta 1215 Winston Churchill also writes,
“The facts embodied in it and the circumstances giving rise to them were buried or misunderstood. The underlying idea of the sovereignty of the law, long existent in feudal custom, was raised by it into a doctrine for the national State. And when in subsequent ages the State, SWOLLEN WITH ITS OWN AUTHORITY, has attempted to ride roughshod over the rights or liberties of the subject it is to this doctrine that appeal has again and again been made, and never as yet, without success.”
[Churchill, A History of the English Speaking Peoples (1956)]
Article 61 in full:
 “Since, moreover, for God and the betterment of our kingdom and for the better allaying of the discord that has arisen between us and our barons we have granted all these things aforesaid, wishing them to enjoy the use of them unimpaired and unshaken for ever, we give and grant them the under-written security, namely, that the barons shall choose any twenty-five barons of the kingdom they wish, who must with all their might observe, hold and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties which we have granted and confirmed to them by this present charter of ours, so that if we, or our justiciar, or our bailiffs or any one of our servants offend in any way against anyone or transgress any of the articles of the peace or the security and the offence be notified to four of the aforesaid twenty-five barons, those four barons shall come to us, or to our justiciar if we are out of the kingdom, and, laying the transgression before us, shall petition us to have that transgression corrected without delay. And if we do not correct the transgression, or if we are out of the kingdom, if our justiciar does not correct it, within forty days, reckoning from the time it was brought to our notice or to that of our justiciar if we were out of the kingdom, the aforesaid four barons shall refer that case to the rest of the twenty-five barons and those twenty-five barons together with the community of the whole land shall distrain and distress us in every way they can, namely, by seizing castles, lands, possessions, and in such other ways as they can, saving our person and the persons of our queen and our children, until, in their opinion, amends have been made; and when amends have been made, they shall obey us as they did before. And let anyone in the land who wishes take an oath to obey the orders of the said twenty-five barons for the execution of all the aforesaid matters, and with them to distress us as much as he can, and we publicly and freely give anyone leave to take the oath who wishes to take it and we will never prohibit anyone from taking it. Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling of themselves and of their own accord to take an oath to the twenty-five barons to help them to distrain and distress us, we will make them take the oath as aforesaid at our command. And if any of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country or is in any other way prevented from carrying out the things aforesaid, the rest of the aforesaid twenty-five barons shall choose as they think fit another one in his place, and he shall take the oath like the rest. In all matters the execution of which is committed to these twenty-five barons, if it should happen that these twenty-five are present yet disagree among themselves about anything, or if some of those summoned will not or cannot be present, that shall be held as fixed and established which the majority of those present ordained or commanded, exactly as if all the twenty-five had consented to it; and the said twenty-five shall swear that they will faithfully observe all the things aforesaid and will do all they can to get them observed. And we will procure nothing from anyone, either personally or through anyone else, whereby any of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing is procured, let it be void and null, and we will never use it either personally or through another.”
Visit HERE for more information depth info.